Goodbye M4's, The Army Wants .308's

American Revival Apparel Company

madHatter

Marksman
Mar 25, 2015
1,484
661
113
Fuckville
so they couldn't find a glock rifle, gotta go back to a 1911!!!


srsly.... bring out the rail guns and laser blasters already. enough of toying with my emotions
 
  • Like
Reactions: dougiemac

1776

World Class Dick Wrangler
Site Supporter
Kalash Klub
Sep 5, 2015
3,590
8,600
113
Da SAV
Zip code
31401
The Army really should quite dicking around with compromises. Nobody wants to carry a .308 on a patrol and there's no need.
In my mind, the ideal would be to maintain the M4 for POGs, increase the quantity and quality of SDMs and give them all a solid semi auto 308 while issuing MP7s to people who might actually engage in a CQB scenario. Yeah, it'd be expensive, but it would be efficient.
 

AtlMedic

Not A Doctor
Mar 25, 2015
2,644
1,441
113
Smyrna, GA
Zip code
30082
The Army really should quite dicking around with compromises. Nobody wants to carry a .308 on a patrol and there's no need.
In my mind, the ideal would be to maintain the M4 for POGs, increase the quantity and quality of SDMs and give them all a solid semi auto 308 while issuing MP7s to people who might actually engage in a CQB scenario. Yeah, it'd be expensive, but it would be efficient.

I'm not a vet or anything. But this makes sense to me. It seems one of the biggest reasons I've heard to cause the push to a higher power round is that the distance of engagements in Afghanistan.

It seems that for CQB or urban fighting a .308 would be overkill and have the negatives of weight, noise, and over penetration.
 

Woodstock

Tracker
Jun 29, 2015
529
189
113
Zip code
30012
Why not lasers


Seriously, they got rid of the 308 which iirc was used in ww2 and Korea and some in Vietnam, so why the change back?
 
Last edited:

Rwjeter

Space Force General Freeze.
Kalash Klub
Lifetime Supporter
Nov 16, 2016
5,354
10,815
113
Temple
Zip code
30179
I'm not a vet or anything. But this makes sense to me. It seems one of the biggest reasons I've heard to cause the push to a higher power round is that the distance of engagements in Afghanistan.

It seems that for CQB or urban fighting a .308 would be overkill and have the negatives of weight, noise, and over penetration.
308 does seem like overkill for urban. @1776 has a good point. Train more SDMs and give them the rifle they need to perform at range then in missions that might encounter CQB a lightweight Sub gun that will be agile enough to keep them in the fight. The rest maintains the M4 or similar 5.56.
 

Mac11FA

Disgruntled large member
Super Moderator
Lifetime Supporter
Patriot Lifetime
Mar 26, 2015
3,840
3,011
113
Locust Grove, GA
Zip code
30248
Why not 7.62 x 39? Works great on M4 platform. Of course on the plus side .308 ammo will get cheap once milsurp hits the streets!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rwjeter

ReservoirDawg10

Sniper
Site Supporter
Apr 10, 2016
1,655
1,571
113
Gwinnett
Zip code
30519
They need to be looking at 6.5 Grendel for carbines. The SOC is now looking into 6.5 creedmoor and 260 rem for precision rifles.

It's amazing to me how slow the military is to adopt new technology.
 

Red Dawn

Wolverines
Site Supporter
Lifetime Supporter
Aug 12, 2015
5,743
6,957
113
H Town
Zip code
30228
They need to be looking at 6.5 Grendel for carbines. The SOC is now looking into 6.5 creedmoor and 260 rem for precision rifles.

It's amazing to me how slow the military is to adopt new technology.

Bill Alexander is leaving Alexander Arms to work with the defense. That could be a 6.5 round or 338 magnum who knows.
 

Red Dawn

Wolverines
Site Supporter
Lifetime Supporter
Aug 12, 2015
5,743
6,957
113
H Town
Zip code
30228
The article is more aimed at the xm1158 ADVAP round IMO. 308 is heavy but a new round for 556 that breaks level IV armor that's more realistic.