Search results

The disagreement was based on a misunderstanding. There is no disagreement, we both actually have the same opinion. That was all I was hoping to establish.

Here's what happened ok. You read my statement in a state of heightened emotion. You read the words "deaths" and "insignificant" and failed to understand that I was simply referring to the statistical probability of dying in the manner that they did, not the people themselves. I get it...

Still waiting. What's the matter....can't find any facts to back up your bs?

Still waiting...............I'm happy to apologize if it's warranted. Otherwise, it's you that owe me an apology for acting like a dick and putting word in my mouth.

We sure wouldn't want facts to cloud our emotions now would we? LOL

Still waiting..........you've accused me of something, now show me the quote. C'mon....tick tick tick...

I'm still waiting for you to cite what you're accusing me of. Otherwise shut the fuck up and stop putting words in my mouth.

Again. Show me where I said the people killed were insignificant. If you're going to accuse me of something and go around frothing at the mouth, at least nut up and show me where I said what you're accusing me of.

Oh, you mean this isn't the thread where we just make up shit? Just following your lead.

Here's my heinous quote. Notice my extreme hatred for military personnel. "Oh probably, but the point is that people get all worried about statistically insignificant events, while totally ignoring the stuff has has a much, much greater likelihood of killing you." Does anyone really dispute...

Ok. Once again. The numbers of people killed in the US by ISIS are insignificant. I did not say that the PEOPLE were insignificant, merely the STATISTICS. As far as deaths go, people struck by lightning are an insignificant statistic as well. I tell you what. Go back and find a quote where...

Put it in the back of the truck and drive a mile down the road and put it in the ditch. Solved.

That's true, but they did have "IQ" in their name. That's pretty sciencey.

They are top tier, but like I said, I've found sediment in their gas. Maybe it was a station with a dirty tank, I dunno but I've never had an issue with Chevron or Shell so that's what I buy. Same reason I switched from Quaker State to Mobil1 in highschool I worked for a mechanic and probably...

Yeah, I saw that.

I've used the old Aguila IQ..i think it was called. Anyway, all zinc bullets with a massive cavity. I had some in .40 and shot prairie dogs with them. Same results. Imagine that.

I filled up some 5 gallon cans there and had visible sediment in the bottom. Couple that with the fact that I prefer Techron to whatever QT uses and I just stick with a top tier that I know is quality. It's a pretty non-scientific approach, but I just can't get myself to buy it. I also read...

This is how we end up with crap gas at all gas stations. There isn't much incentive for companies to use higher quality detergents if all anyone cares about is price. If no one sees a difference in quality, they'll stop caring about quality. That's how walmart happened.

I suppose so, I just never see variation like that around here except at QT, and I won't burn their gas.

He keeps wanting to touch me when I get drunk. :unsure: