Search results

I agree, and that's why I loathe the Patriot Act. Fact is it's legal, and that's what matters to the law, not a subjective "right" or "wrong".

Well, the legal part is a big deal. Now we have massive, widespread violations of civil rights and there's not a damned thing you can do about it.

It has more to do with restructuring the way we think about government, re-thinking our consumerism and the way the health of a country and it's credit rating is based soley on it's consumption and production. Sometimes you need a forest fire to accomplish what some people with rakes and trash...

Yeah, it's gotta be hard sailing through life with answers cropping up before the question arises.....some day man...some day I might get there. lol

Which is exactly why I would have chosen a different photo to hawk my shit.

I was simply trying to see it through the eyes of the average consumer. I think your binary thinking (your point of view vs. mine) was clouding your judgement. ;)

Again, my issue is that it appears that they may have used a photo that suggests that it's legal to install their product on a sbr sans stamp. The gun in the pic appears to have a sub 16" barrel. That was my only point...the only point I was making.

There's no possible way to tell. That's the problem with generic pictures. That is also not trying to appear to be something other than what it is.

Which is why my beef was with the pic of the firearm shown, not the stock.

To the person familiar with rifle and pistol tubes yes.

And then not legal without a stamp. That was my point. That will happen.

lol

Unless someone does, and is in violation of the law.

*sigh* I didn't, but it does require extra paperwork. The "between the BATFE and me" is the part that could land folks in hot water if they were mislead by the illustration on the website.

Not your pic, the one the company posted advertising their product. It's pretty hard to tell how long this barrel is, but it looks pretty fucking short.

I had a side folder, poly receiver, 18" PTR. It was awesome, and one of the few I regret selling. The reason behind the CZ or Sig MPx is that I'm thinking worst case scenario in two years. Here goes: Another shooting prompts Hillary or equivalent to push through an AWBII type legislation...

That's exactly my point. The photo on the company website is very misleading. The buffer tube looks longer than the barrel.

lol, just bought some more mags and am contemplating an AR pistol in .223 and 9mm. If she gets in, it doesn't matter what she does, the terror will decimate supplies just like 2008. I also wouldn't mind a CZ Scorpion Evo3

I guess my point was pretty well proven when Romi thought it was NFA.

So if your rifle has a buttstock and is under 16" it makes no difference to the BATFE?