Search results

All we have are privileges, that's all we've ever had. Inalienable rights are 100% myth.

If you're worried about painting it for effectiveness, don't worry about detail. Just paint it a color that isn't too dark, and break it up a bit with some slightly darker colors. Light grays, light to medium browns. Just spray that shit on.

10.42 miles

Nope, Four Roses Single barrel (not the blend) for sub $40 is the best bourbon you can buy right now for the $$. It's truly outstanding..everything a great bourbon should be. You hit it on the head. Or, if you want something a little less "bright" with a bit less vanilla, Eagle Rare Single...

Well, fuck it. l

lol, I've noticed.

Yeah, I have a filter and tablets, but if you have to venture out to find something to filter that can present risks too. It's certainly necessary, but the primo situation would be to kick back and drink bottled water.

You seem to be living in a world of hyperbole.

Water. How much do you have in your home right now? (obviously not counting the easily contaminated tap water). I usually have between 15 and 25 gallons. I use 5 gallon jugs for our water cooler, and try to stay at 15 minimum. I may get a few more for the pantry though.

The only argument I'm making is that clear definitions make infringement more difficult. Are you really arguing that?

Lawyers getting involved made it possible for the SC to make the determination that the Second Amendment applies to individuals (the people), and thus has eliminated several anti-gun laws. Heller vs. DC, and the Chicago gun ban. Their laws still suck, but at least there isn't an all out ban on...

Yes...is there a definition that contradicts another, or are they all variations of a theme?

See the need for a clear, and legally defensible definition? Also, "person" and "property" as defined are used in all sorts of legal language. In this case, were talking about defining one word, in context of a particular amendment. That's much, much more specific.

Blasted out a little 3.5 miler with the group last night.

The definitions may change, but in their current state the definition is in itself, clear and legally definable. Even if the definition changes over time, at any given point the definition embodies law. Definitions, should and could change over time, but that would be the point of clarifying...

That doesn't really have anything to do with it, and in no way reflects on anything other than itself. US law is chock full of clearly defined and legally defensible definitions.

DVD's? You're already obviously wearing a tweed jacket and scanning the JC Penny for a new set of knickers. Just watch it in black and white. Otherwise, buy a cable and if that doesn't work, buy a new video record player.

Into the ether..............:alien2:

Put down the vodka, drink a quart of water, brush your teeth, give the wife a peck on the cheek and go to bed. lol

:confused2: