Search results

I believe our very existence is a random occurrence, and you could say that our actions are all a result of that random occurrence. You could also argue that there is predictability within microcosms of random events. It just depends on how deep your perspective goes, and honestly it doesn't...

I can' imagine it was very unpleasant, that's why I wouldn't go anywhere near that line. Also, there were zero legal repercussions for him. The law worked, and the truth came out.

There is some gray, but it seems pretty straightforward. If you are liquidating a collection..ok If you sell last years model rifle to fund the purchase of this years model..ok If you occasionally sell some guns out of your collection..ok If you advertise as a buyer and seller of firearms and...

Was he within the law? Did he get charged and convicted?

Even then, the site isn't in possession of the firearm. Who knows what type of bullshit will precipitate from this though.

You have to be fingerprinted to buy ammo now.

If you truly fall within the guidelines that don't require an ffl, it shouldn't take much cash to prove it. The likelihood of you being falsely charged is also pretty slim, as resources are tight, agents are few, and they aren't going to chase cases they know they won't win. It's pretty...

Not true. I've dealt with it in one of the most gun hostile states in the country, and truth came out on top.

Not unless the site were charging a fee for selling, or collecting a percentage of each sale.

Correct. It would have been a first term. lol

Maybe, but due process still gives you recourse to prove your innocence.

Wrong, but there are about a thousand posts on the subject if you search for 15-20 seconds.

You can only hold me responsible for what he did in his first term asshole. ;) And that's pretty much a big fat zero.

No, it's definitely the Feds swooping in and confiscating gun sites.

The timing does look suspicious, but if there have been repeat violations I'd suppose that would pre-date any correlation to BO's EO.

I'm not Barack Obama. ;)

As I understood the question it was more about right brain/left brain, rather than right or left politically.

Anyway, it's their fucking website and if they don't like guns or gun content, that's their call...right?

ROLLEYES DUDE. I wasn't attempting to chastise you. Come on, it's too early for that big of a burr to be under your saddle cowboy. I was simply not wanting to discount the possibility that the termination wasn't gun related. Isn't that logical before we break out the pitchforks and torches?

Her's are obviously (I hope) non-violent, but she doesn't believe manufactured systems have any chance at maintaining order, peace, or happiness. She has some views that people would call liberal, but only because they are typically scooped up by liberals and tossed into their bucket.