Yeah, it's flawed but I think it's worth the watch. There is a facet that contradicts itself. Notice the criticism of communism toward the beginning and an underlying support for communistic traits for individual satisfaction. I suppose it's subjective in that what makes one person happy may not hold true for others.I probably won't agree with most of it but I like to see where others are in figuring out this clusterfuck.
IMO the way the system has been altered is not conducive to voting. At one time voting in this country really didn't mean much as the Constitution prevented radical change but with the suspension of the Constitution since 1933 (and yes, there are no constitutional protections anymore) voting has turned into voting for your individual interests and not the interests of the people. Of course since there is no real "country" anymore every president is the same as the previous. They just continue to operate under the Emergency Banking Relief Act (Trading With the Enemy Act) and there is no true freedom or ownership.Yeah, it's flawed but I think it's worth the watch. There is a facet that contradicts itself. Notice the criticism of communism toward the beginning and an underlying support for communistic traits for individual satisfaction. I suppose it's subjective in that what makes one person happy may not hold true for others.
Yeah, it'd make more sense to lobby lobbyists. lolIMO the way the system has been altered is not conducive to voting. At one time voting in this country really didn't mean much as the Constitution prevented radical change but with the suspension of the Constitution since 1933 (and yes, there are no constitutional protections anymore) voting has turned into voting for your individual interests and not the interests of the people. Of course since there is no real "country" anymore every president is the same as the previous. They just continue to operate under the Emergency Banking Relief Act (Trading With the Enemy Act) and there is no true freedom or ownership.