I've always gotten by with Harris bi-pods and Goodyear tires... I don't need an Atlas (I have no idea what you have on that rifle). I load most of my rifle ammo, but wouldn't mind hearing what you've got.
I've always gotten by with Harris bi-pods and Goodyear tires... I don't need an Atlas (I have no idea what you have on that rifle). I load most of my rifle ammo, but wouldn't mind hearing what you've got.
Remington 700 in 308 (still in factory box)
20" Barrel with treaded lug
1:10" twist
Grille Green Stock
Harris Bipod 6'-9" with S Lock
Weaver Picatinny Rail with 20 MOA
Rifle is in perfect condition and only had 20 rounds shot through it
1 box of Black Hills ammo
1/2 box Federal Premium Gold Match
I've got a couple and they seem to work well. I'm sure the Atlas is a bad ass piece of machined metal, but my goodness what's it worth vs. the very functional sub $100 alternative.
You can't shoot a hole in a packing blanket at 50 yards with that junk.
I don't shoot enough but my cousin can thread a needle with his at a 1000 yards....
I wish. If it's free, sure! Lol
2 cans just put on form 4 has wiped out my gun funds for the moment.
Exactly. Also, it's not necessarily less math, as the constants are the only things that change with ranging formulas, but the finer adjustments are more enticing for sure.
If you can tell the difference between a .25moa and .34moa adjustment you're a much better shooter than me.
I think mil-mil is slightly better for ranging at unknown distances but I'm fine with either. The only thing I wouldn't buy is a mil-moa scope.
One thing to think about, it's only a finer adjustment at the one click level. If you're .65 moa off, mil adjustments will get you closer. But this is one where I don't think there's a right answer as long as you understand the system you're using.
Your last part is key. After going to Rob's optic class, if you don't have the understanding, it won't matter at all, MOA, shooters MOA, Mil, just won't matter.
Yes, the mixed turret/reticle are still a mystery to me. Doesn't make much since to add that extra step of annoying to an optic.
Just learning more about long range optics, but I think MOA will be my first choice. Unknown ranging should be the same-ish for both from seeing the examples and hearing how too. The part I see having the biggest issue with will be sizing a target (the human interpretation error part), especially something very far in high heat when you cannot use you max power. Again though, lots for me to learn. Long range optics have been my weak point for sure. Just hoping to get into them and get comfortable with the basics and going from there.