Is a 9mm upper worth the money?

GA Firing Line

Axeman

If you can’t laugh at yourself you’re FUKT!!!
Kalash Klub
Lifetime Supporter
Dec 5, 2016
7,679
36,680
113
Goat Rodeo Clown
Zip code
30188
9mmluger.png

223ME.png

According to these charts, if I use a typical 55gr .223 in my 10.5" barrel I'm getting around 825 ft/lbs of energy at the muzzle.

If I went with a 7.5" 9mmP in the hottest loading I can find (Cor-Bon 115gr +P) I'll be getting around 550 ft/lbs.

A 10.5" barrel is at approx. 575 ft/lbs. A 147gr apparently gains almost nothing after a 5" barrel, so there's no point in putting those through anything bigger than my M9, unless it's just to put a can on it.

I just don't see the merit in dumping $500+ in a 9mm upper with these lousy ballistics.
I'd rather spend the money on a can, so that's what I'm gonna do!
FINALLY!
Now I just gotta finish the paperwork for the NFA Trust...and wait...
 

Leshaire

Weekend Warrior
Mar 27, 2015
3,343
1,994
113
Acworth
Zip code
30102
I don't follow your logic here. Is the only thing in question muzzle energy? Go buy a 458 socom or 300 win mag upper then. Do you want a cheaper to shoot AR, cross gun mag compatibility, home defense with much less wall penetration or a shorter barrel without going deaf? Then go 9mm. Do you want muzzle velocity, muzzle energy, longer range, and more standard AR parts? Then go 223/556.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BangBang and chance

Laufen

Beloved flaming retard
Lifetime Supporter
Mar 23, 2015
7,927
6,129
113
I85
Zip code
30030
I don't follow your logic here. Is the only thing in question muzzle energy? Go buy a 458 socom or 300 win mag upper then. Do you want a cheaper to shoot AR, cross gun mag compatibility, home defense with much less wall penetration or a shorter barrel without going deaf? Then go 9mm. Do you want muzzle velocity, muzzle energy, longer range, and more standard AR parts? Then go 223/556.
The added benefit for me is being able to make hits further away by using a stock...and yeah, being able to slap a Geissele trigger into it is nice too.

The problem with these charts is that they don't take into account what the minimum necessary is, just the maximum you can hope to get.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BangBang

Leshaire

Weekend Warrior
Mar 27, 2015
3,343
1,994
113
Acworth
Zip code
30102
The added benefit for me is being able to make hits further away by using a stock...and yeah, being able to slap a Geissele trigger into it is nice too.

The problem with these charts is that they don't take into account what the minimum necessary is, just the maximum you can hope to get.
Agreed. Why would someone need the maximum amount of muzzle energy possible anyway? I don't see the appeal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BangBang

Laufen

Beloved flaming retard
Lifetime Supporter
Mar 23, 2015
7,927
6,129
113
I85
Zip code
30030
Agreed. Why would someone need the maximum amount of muzzle energy possible anyway? I don't see the appeal.
Maybe you do, but the fact is, it's just one facet to performance. For hunting or HD I'll take lower ME, and a potential for more penetration of the bonded 147gr bullets. Mass x Velocity is one way to measure performance but it's not always the best way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BangBang

The Mechanic

Hunter
Oct 12, 2018
51
53
43
acworth
Zip code
30102
There is nothing wrong with them although I have never seen the allure to drop to a lower power cartridge. Except for target I guess but hey I'm not the one to judge someone for what they want. If they see that they need one then they should go for it. I have AR's in other calibers so it's basically the same thing.
 

dial1911

Waiting for the flash
Site Supporter
Jul 15, 2015
7,331
27,066
113
Anywhere but here
southeastoutdoors.boards.net
Pros:
Cheaper to shoot, by a good bit.
Can be used in pistol caliber carbine (PCC) matches.
I already had a 9mm can, so that was a plus.
Cardboard/clay pigeons do not care how much muzzle energy the bullet has... And most people don't want to get shot with any amount of muzzle energy, regardless of the number.

Cons:
Don't know... long barrel plus can equals super long carbine. Although the stock is a huge plus.
Which reminds me... I've got to get a dang lower filed with the alphabet folks. I'm going to fix the stock vs. brace vs. long/short barrel problem.
 

Axeman

If you can’t laugh at yourself you’re FUKT!!!
Kalash Klub
Lifetime Supporter
Dec 5, 2016
7,679
36,680
113
Goat Rodeo Clown
Zip code
30188
I don't follow your logic here. Is the only thing in question muzzle energy? Go buy a 458 socom or 300 win mag upper then. Do you want a cheaper to shoot AR, cross gun mag compatibility, home defense with much less wall penetration or a shorter barrel without going deaf? Then go 9mm. Do you want muzzle velocity, muzzle energy, longer range, and more standard AR parts? Then go 223/556.
Well that’s a great question.
My initial reason for considering a 9mmP upper was because the 10.5” 5.56 upper I have on my pistol project is just a bit too long to fit in a normal backpack, even though I’ve got a folder on it. So I was thinking about doing the 9mm to replace it as my EDC bag gun. Just in case something horrible happened and I needed more firepower than one of the normal pistols I keep with me. That’s why I was worried about energy, for defensive purposes. Going to something a lot larger defeats the purpose of it being a backpack gun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leshaire

Axeman

If you can’t laugh at yourself you’re FUKT!!!
Kalash Klub
Lifetime Supporter
Dec 5, 2016
7,679
36,680
113
Goat Rodeo Clown
Zip code
30188
Maybe you do, but the fact is, it's just one facet to performance. For hunting or HD I'll take lower ME, and a potential for more penetration of the bonded 147gr bullets. Mass x Velocity is one way to measure performance but it's not always the best way.
I disagree here. You need as much energy as possible to make the bullet expand, which will cause the bullet to stop inside it’s intended target - rather than over penetrating and dumping that energy past the target - possibly into an innocent, but certainly not where it will do the intended job.
In pistol calibers, heavier slower bullets just don’t perform as well with one exception; 230gr Hydra Shok in .45ACP.
 

BangBang

Apprentice to master AR builder Greg Vess
Aug 26, 2018
874
3,641
113
Danielsville
Zip code
30633
There is nothing wrong with them although I have never seen the allure to drop to a lower power cartridge. Except for target I guess but hey I'm not the one to judge someone for what they want. If they see that they need one then they should go for it. I have AR's in other calibers so it's basically the same thing.
I’ve got AR’s in .22lr, 5.56 and .308 (you helped me build the .308)

My AR22 sees more range time than the other two combined because it’s WAY cheaper to shoot.

I’ve seriously only put MAYBE 40 rounds through that Mega .308 since you and I completed that build because it’s AT LEAST 50 cents everytime I pull the trigger.

I can’t even enjoy it because I’m thinking about the money the whole time! LOL!
 
Last edited:

Jake

Steering wheel holder
Super Moderator
Kalash Klub
Lifetime Supporter
Aug 11, 2015
8,361
36,820
113
Ball Ground
Zip code
30189
In pistol calibers, heavier slower bullets just don’t perform as well with one exception; 230gr Hydra Shok in .45ACP.

Hydra Shok's suck. HST is where it's at, in all calibers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dial1911

cmshoot

Marksman
Jul 12, 2016
1,403
1,710
113
Dallas, GA
Zip code
30132
With the increase in active shooters, the possibility of engaging nogoodniks at longer distances is likewise increasing.

I don’t shoot matches, so I’m not a fan of PCC’s. For one thing, for anti-personnel use I want to be able to punch through body armor.

I already have cans to fit every caliber I own, except for my .338 Lapua, and that is next. If I want to run a can on a long gun, I slap my Silencerco Omega on my 10.5” SIG 556xi in 7.62x39mm.

A buddy of mine, who happens to be a dang fine operator and sponsored competitor, once said, “They only call it ‘over penetration’ when they ain’t trying to shoot through shit.....otherwise it’s just fine!”

If I have the choice between over- and under-penetration, I’ll choose the former and watch my backstop.